Security guards targeted because they cost too much?

So, the risk is "carrying cash without escorts". What's the cause?

If you want to speak good english, then don’t read some Straits Times headlines aloud. If not for the little whatsitcalled before the headline, I’d have been a little more curious about why ‘carrying cash without escorts’ was a consequence of a risk taken. You risk being robbed. You don’t risk carrying cash without escorts. And security guards might take offence too at the whatsitcalled below the headline:

Security guards are prime targets for robbers?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Facebook Comments Box

3 thoughts on “Security guards targeted because they cost too much?”

  1. Unfortunately security guards are targets. Finanically and criminally. these guys need to make a living too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *