The good oil on bad fats

I said, 'get me a pic to do with "Trans Fat", not "Fat Trans"'
Photo by FredArmitage
I now think that people who are easily confused (like myself) are less likely to eat healthily given the amount of information now available to us about saturated, unsaturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, hydrogenated, partially hydrogenated fats and four-room HDB flats.
Naomi and I try sporadically to eat healthily, and because we are such ingterneck-savvy people, we’ve taken to reading up about what we’re eating in the hope of knowing what to eat and what we shouldn’t. This is what we know so far:
Don’t eat so much fatty food, but some fats are good;
Diary products contain unsaturated fats, so we shouldn’t eat so much, but we need the calcium;
Fish contain good fats, but also apparently contain mercury, which, if you don't intend being a human thermometer, isn't all that good for you. (Next time you think you're running a temperature, stuff a mackerel in your mouth, and it'll tell you if you need a panadol and a cold bath).
The FDA says, "Scientific evidence shows that consumption of saturated fat, trans fat, and dietary cholesterol raises low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or “bad cholesterol,” levels, which increases the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). According to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, more than 12.5 million Americans have CHD, and more than 500,000 die each year. That makes CHD one of the leading causes of death in the United States.”;
and that, “Trans fat, like saturated fat and dietary cholesterol, raises the LDL cholesterol that increases your risk for CHD. Americans consume on average 4 to 5 times as much saturated fat as trans fat in their diets. Although saturated fat is the main dietary culprit that raises LDL, trans fat and dietary cholesterol also contribute significantly.”
Harvard (meaning it’s gotta be good and authoritative) nutritionists say that, “By our most conservative estimate, replacement of partially hydrogenated fat in the U.S. diet with natural unhydrogenated vegetable oils would prevent approximately 30,000 premature coronary deaths per year, and epidemiologic evidence suggests this number is closer to 100,000 premature deaths annually.”
In Singapore, the HPB says, "Yes. Trans fat raises LDL-cholesterol ("bad" cholesterol) and reduces HDL-cholesterol ("good" cholesterol) in the body. As a result, trans fat increases the risk of developing heart disease. There is no conclusive evidence to date for the effect of trans fat on other health risks such as diabetes or cancer. Currently there is also no evidence to show that consumption of trans fat found naturally in food will increase the risk of heart disease, so there is no reason to avoid beef, lamb, mutton or dairy products because they contain trans fat. ".
I don't know, but our local health board advisory seems to sound a bit... what's the word for it? Contradictorated? Polycontradictorated? Monocontradictorated... or at least partially contradictorated?
So, what can you do to figure out what's good to eat and what isn't?
The FDA made it compulsory from 2006 for manufacturers to state trans fat levels on food labels, so that you can figure out, say, whether to eat a slab of butter or a spoonful of margarine:
1 tablespoon of butter contains zero trans fat;
1 tablespoon of margarine contains 3 grams of trans fat;
But the same amount of butter contains 30 milligrams of cholesterol while margarine doesn't. Arrgh! so which do I put on my toast before it gets cold?
OK, so you may be able to work out some sort of balance as to how much is considered “in moderation” for either. But here’s the rub:
U.S. labelling rules state that: "if the serving contains less than 0.5 gram [of trans fat], the content, when declared, shall be expressed as zero."
To that, the good folk at bantransfat.com say: "Suppose a product contains 0.4 grams per serving and you eat four servings (which is not uncommon). You have just consumed 1.6 grams of trans fat, despite the fact that the package claims that the product contains zero grams of trans fat per serving."
Nabeh, kenah bluff. Which is serious stuff considering the WHO recommends that total daily intake of trans fat should be below 2g.
Bantransfat.com also tells us that "Fully hydrogenated oils do not contain trans fat. However, if the word "hydrogenated" is used without the word "partially," that product may contain partially hydrogenated oil. Not all labeling is accurate and the word "partially" may have been wrongfully omitted on some products."
So, can kenah bluff again in instances where it's not compulsory to list trans fat content (like here). Sure we’ve got promotional material at hawker centres and food stalls telling us that they don’t use lard in their cooking and use ‘vegetable oil’ instead. But you should know when they say “vegetable oil”, it really is usually palm oil or peanut oil if they don’t say otherwise, which is usually partially hydrogenated, which means it contains trans fat.
Our friendly local health board says they’ve been “working with ingredient suppliers to develop reduced trans fat shortenings used in baked products. To date, at least one major local biscuit manufacturer has switched to using trans fat free shortening, and several other pastry retailers will also be switching over to this shortening soon.”
In the meantime, ask yourselves, if your bread talks, and your Chang Kee is Old, is it because they contain partially hydrogenated oils?
It is a serious matter, especially is you look at the numbers of estimated premature deaths in the US, but no worry, because "This year, HPB will focus on fat as part of its nutrition education efforts. We have recently conducted a public forum on fats - look out for more events coming your way!"
Yay, events!
Technorati Tags: trans fat, health, HPB, Singapore
Ads
Recent posts
- What Say You Episode 12: Men Who Cook
- What Say You Episode 11: Singaporeans and Food
- What Say You Episode 10: Finding Love
- Episode 9: Inequality Begins At Home
- Walking back from lunch
- Chinese Christmas
- Elmo finally announces the winner
- Yes, some of our CPF money goes into Temasek & GIC
- Golf GTI Party Report
- Volkswagen GTI 35th Anniversary Celebrations
- Reasons to cancel Halloween
- What Say You? Episode 8: Ups and Downs of Marrying Up and Down
- What Say You? Episode 7: “If you propose to me I’ll break up with you”
- Filipino grandma’s reading of “Go The F*** To Sleep”
- I say!
Tags
2009 Animals Apple Army Australia baby Blog by Jake children china Christmas CNY Coffee! Eating to death Elections Engrish Filem food Grober iPhone kai Law Music National Service Navel Gazing Nutted by the news On the side Parenting Parliament Podcast Scrapbook Signs of life Singapore singaporean Singlish Straits Times tech & internet Television Theatre The Banned Wagon TODAY: Chip off the Blog Toys Travel Tweets twitter VideoRecent Comments
Twitter
Categories
- Advertorial (19)
- Army / National Service (62)
- At home (76)
- Eating (157)
- Laws of our land (97)
- Living (495)
- Media (204)
- Parenting (59)
- People (108)
- Places (158)
- Podcast (57)
- The Ingterneck (240)
- Toys (77)
- Tweets (53)
Archives
- December 2011 (7)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (6)
- September 2011 (11)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (15)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (12)
- January 2011 (14)
- December 2010 (13)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (10)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (6)
- May 2010 (6)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (16)
- January 2010 (24)
- December 2009 (9)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (9)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (14)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (15)
- April 2009 (17)
- March 2009 (16)
- February 2009 (20)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (12)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (31)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (14)
- April 2008 (50)
- March 2008 (31)
- February 2008 (11)
- January 2008 (10)
- December 2007 (14)
- November 2007 (24)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (16)
- July 2007 (16)
- June 2007 (15)
- May 2007 (16)
- April 2007 (22)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (9)
- January 2007 (11)
- December 2006 (10)
- November 2006 (26)
- October 2006 (30)
- September 2006 (30)
- August 2006 (21)
- July 2006 (40)
- June 2006 (32)
- May 2006 (26)
- April 2006 (35)
- March 2006 (33)
- February 2006 (33)
- January 2006 (27)
- December 2005 (39)
- November 2005 (36)
- October 2005 (28)
- September 2005 (49)
- August 2005 (34)
- July 2005 (16)
- June 2005 (27)
- May 2005 (33)
- April 2005 (40)
- March 2005 (37)
- February 2005 (34)
- January 2005 (30)
- December 2004 (17)
- November 2004 (24)
- October 2004 (28)
- September 2004 (30)
- August 2004 (31)
- July 2004 (31)
- June 2004 (31)
- May 2004 (36)
- April 2004 (34)
- March 2004 (3)
- February 2004 (1)
- January 2004 (7)
- December 2003 (2)
- November 2003 (1)
- August 2003 (1)
- July 2003 (6)
- June 2003 (4)
- April 2003 (1)
- March 2003 (1)
- December 2002 (1)
Switch site




Pingback: Daily SG: 31 Oct 2007 « The Singapore Daily