Laws of our land Part III: Sedition Act & Racism
A lot of us (me included, though I’ve suspected for awhile) found out this morning that if you make a racist comment on a forum or a blog and you can be charged under the Sedition Act.
In fact, there are a variety of things you could do on your blog that might be construed as an act with a seditious tendency (s.3.1), even this blog post, if I’m not careful, and in my stream of consciousness, end up writing things that “raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore” (s.3.1(d))
So, the fellas charged this morning allegedly made racist remarks on an open forum and on a website/blog, and would have been charged under ss. 4.1©, 4.2, 3.1(e). (Anyone with detailed information, please leave comments or trackback).
I’ll say now that I’m all against racism and racist remarks online and off, and that regardless of the law, I think it is repulsive and wrongful behaviour.
And as regards the law, outlawing racism is obviously not unique to Singapore. There are the Australian anti-racial vilification laws (e.g. Racial Vilification Act 1996 (South Australia), where you will find that the punishments are quite severe, even when compared with our very own Sedition Act.
Even as I write this post as quickly as I can, newswires around the world have already or are about to pick up on the screaming headline ‘Bloggers Charged With Sedition in Singapore’, (with Steven McDermott probably sharpening his scissors and thickening his glue for a bit of cut and paste action as I write), which as you can see, isn’t really the issue.
For mine, the issue is a public relations related one. We have laws to protect against racism, and while these laws ain’t broke, they sure could do with a little polishing. Enact an anti-racial vilification law, fellas. Leave the Sedition Act for specific seditious acts against the State.
[Series: Laws of our land Part II, Part I]
Surf stop: Tomorrow.sg: Two bloggers charged under Sedition Act over racist remarks
Technorati Tags: blog, racism, sedition, Singapore
Ads
Recent posts
- What Say You Episode 12: Men Who Cook
- What Say You Episode 11: Singaporeans and Food
- What Say You Episode 10: Finding Love
- Episode 9: Inequality Begins At Home
- Walking back from lunch
- Chinese Christmas
- Elmo finally announces the winner
- Yes, some of our CPF money goes into Temasek & GIC
- Golf GTI Party Report
- Volkswagen GTI 35th Anniversary Celebrations
- Reasons to cancel Halloween
- What Say You? Episode 8: Ups and Downs of Marrying Up and Down
- What Say You? Episode 7: “If you propose to me I’ll break up with you”
- Filipino grandma’s reading of “Go The F*** To Sleep”
- I say!
Tags
2009 Animals Apple Army Australia baby Blog by Jake children china Christmas CNY Coffee! Eating to death Elections Engrish Filem food Grober iPhone kai Law Music National Service Navel Gazing Nutted by the news On the side Parenting Parliament Podcast Scrapbook Signs of life Singapore singaporean Singlish Straits Times tech & internet Television Theatre The Banned Wagon TODAY: Chip off the Blog Toys Travel Tweets twitter VideoRecent Comments
Twitter
Categories
- Advertorial (19)
- Army / National Service (62)
- At home (76)
- Eating (157)
- Laws of our land (97)
- Living (495)
- Media (204)
- Parenting (59)
- People (108)
- Places (158)
- Podcast (57)
- The Ingterneck (240)
- Toys (77)
- Tweets (53)
Archives
- December 2011 (7)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (6)
- September 2011 (11)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (15)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (12)
- January 2011 (14)
- December 2010 (13)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (10)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (6)
- May 2010 (6)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (16)
- January 2010 (24)
- December 2009 (9)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (9)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (14)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (15)
- April 2009 (17)
- March 2009 (16)
- February 2009 (20)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (12)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (31)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (14)
- April 2008 (50)
- March 2008 (31)
- February 2008 (11)
- January 2008 (10)
- December 2007 (14)
- November 2007 (24)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (16)
- July 2007 (16)
- June 2007 (15)
- May 2007 (16)
- April 2007 (22)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (9)
- January 2007 (11)
- December 2006 (10)
- November 2006 (26)
- October 2006 (30)
- September 2006 (30)
- August 2006 (21)
- July 2006 (40)
- June 2006 (32)
- May 2006 (26)
- April 2006 (35)
- March 2006 (33)
- February 2006 (33)
- January 2006 (27)
- December 2005 (39)
- November 2005 (36)
- October 2005 (28)
- September 2005 (49)
- August 2005 (34)
- July 2005 (16)
- June 2005 (27)
- May 2005 (33)
- April 2005 (40)
- March 2005 (37)
- February 2005 (34)
- January 2005 (30)
- December 2004 (17)
- November 2004 (24)
- October 2004 (28)
- September 2004 (30)
- August 2004 (31)
- July 2004 (31)
- June 2004 (31)
- May 2004 (36)
- April 2004 (34)
- March 2004 (3)
- February 2004 (1)
- January 2004 (7)
- December 2003 (2)
- November 2003 (1)
- August 2003 (1)
- July 2003 (6)
- June 2003 (4)
- April 2003 (1)
- March 2003 (1)
- December 2002 (1)
Switch site




Pingback: Singapore Ink. » The “seditionary” “bloggers”
Pingback: SingaSingapore
Pingback: asiapundit
Pingback: From a Singapore Angle
Pingback: little pink soap dinosaur
Pingback: ringisei | リンギセイ » Blog Archive » Horror! Shock! Controversy! Yawn!
Pingback: Global Voices Online » Blog Archive » Two Singapore bloggers charged for sedition for racist comments online
Pingback: The English Guy
Pingback: ZDNet Asia
Pingback: Wannabe Lawyer
Pingback: Global Voices Online » Blog Archive » Singapore cracks down on bloggers